Неделя, 28.04.2024, 01:27
Main » Ad Board » ДРЕВЕН ЕГИПЕТ И АФРИКА » Комплексни изследвания

THOMAS YOUNG - COLLECTED EGYPTOLOGICAL WORKS
19.02.2023, 14:32

Днес всички помнят Шамполион, но едва ли някой освен специалистите си спомня за Томас Йънг (1773-1829). А това е не просто един от последните учени енциклопедисти. Освен с теория на светлината, строеж на окото, физиология, медицина, строеж на твърдите тела, музика и други клонове на познанието, той е и един от първите изследователи опитвали се да разгадаят тайната на египетските йероглифи. Макар успехите му да са повече в анализа на демотическото писмо, а дори и там да допуска някои грешки (считайки го за изцяло фонетично), неговите усилия и опити не остават без полза и той е един от достойните за възпоменание участници в най-ранните години на зараждащата се египтология.

Thomas Young - Hieroglyphics. Volume I, London, Egyptian Society, 1823

Thomas Young - Hieroglyphics. Volume II, London, Royal Society of Literature, 1828

- на древноегипетски език (йероглифи и латинска транслитерация) и английски език, от HEIDI: Heidelberg University Digital Library, формат PDF. Сваляне с ляв бутон (downloading by left button) от страницата на предоставящия сървър, после през бутона Download / after by the Download button.

Thomas Young - An account of some recent discoveries in hieroglyphical literature and Egyptian antiquities : Including the author's original alphabet, as extended by Mr. Champollion, with a translation of five unpublished Greek and Egyptian manuscripts, London, John Murray, 1823

Henry Tattam, Thomas Young - A compendious grammar of the Egyptian language as contained in the Coptic and Sahidic dialects; with observations on the Bashmuric: together with alphabets and numerals in the hieroglyphic and enchorial characters, London, John Murray, 1830

- на древноегипетски език (йероглифи и латинска транслитерация) и английски език, от Internet Archive, формат PDF. Свалянето става с десен бутон (downloading by right button) и Save as...

Andrew Robinson - The Last Man Who Knew Everything: Thomas Young, the Anonymous Polymath Who Proved Newton Wrong, Explained How We See, Cured the Sick and Deciphered the Rosetta Stone, Oxford, Oneworld Publications, 2006

- на английски език, от MEGA, формат PDF. Сваляне с ляв бутон (downloading by left button) и после през бутона Download.

 

Added by: Admin | | Tags: древнооегипетска епиграфика, копти, египтология, коптски език, Древен Египет, йероглифи
Views: 417 | Placed till: 19.03.2023 | Rating: 0.0/0
Total comments: 1
1 Admin  
0
Thomas Young FRS (13 June 1773 – 10 May 1829) was a British polymath who made notable contributions to the fields of vision, light, solid mechanics, energy, physiology, language, musical harmony, and Egyptology. He was instrumental in the decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs, specifically the Rosetta Stone.

Young has been described as "The Last Man Who Knew Everything". His work influenced that of William Herschel, Hermann von Helmholtz, James Clerk Maxwell, and Albert Einstein. Young is credited with establishing the wave theory of light, in contrast to the particle theory of Isaac Newton. Young's work was subsequently supported by the work of Augustin-Jean Fresnel.

Young made significant contributions to the decipherment of ancient Egyptian writing systems. He started his Egyptology work rather late, in 1813, when the work was already in progress among other researchers.

He began by using an Egyptian demotic alphabet of 29 letters built up by Johan David Åkerblad in 1802 (14 turned out to be incorrect). Åkerblad was correct in stressing the importance of the demotic text in trying to read the inscriptions, but he wrongly believed that demotic was entirely alphabetic.

By 1814 Young had completely translated the "enchorial" text of the Rosetta Stone (using a list with 86 demotic words), and then studied the hieroglyphic alphabet but initially failed to recognise that the demotic and hieroglyphic texts were paraphrases and not simple translations.

There was considerable rivalry between Young and Jean-François Champollion while both were working on hieroglyphic decipherment. At first they briefly cooperated in their work, but later, from around 1815, a chill arose between them. For many years they kept details of their work away from each other.

Some of Young's conclusions appeared in the famous article "Egypt" he wrote for the 1818 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica.

When Champollion finally published a translation of the hieroglyphs and the key to the grammatical system in 1822, Young (and many others) praised his work. Nevertheless, a year later Young published an Account of the Recent Discoveries in Hieroglyphic Literature and Egyptian Antiquities, with the aim of having his own work recognised as the basis for Champollion's system.

Young had correctly found the sound value of six hieroglyphic signs, but had not deduced the grammar of the language. Young himself acknowledged that he was somewhat at a disadvantage because Champollion's knowledge of the relevant languages, such as Coptic, was much greater.

Several scholars have suggested that Young's true contribution to Egyptology was his decipherment of the demotic script. He made the first major advances in this area; he also correctly identified demotic as being composed by both ideographic and phonetic signs.

Subsequently, Young felt that Champollion was unwilling to share the credit for the decipherment. In the ensuing controversy, strongly motivated by the political tensions of that time, the British tended to champion Young, while the French mostly championed Champollion. Champollion did acknowledge some of Young's contribution, but rather sparingly. However, after 1826, when Champollion was a curator in the Louvre, he did offer Young access to demotic manuscripts.

In England, while Sir George Lewis still doubted Champollion's achievement as late as 1862, others were more accepting. For example, Reginald Poole, and Sir Peter Le Page Renouf both defended Champollion.

Only registered users can add comments.
[ Registration | Login ]