Сряда, 24.04.2024, 10:52
Main » Ad Board » ДРЕВЕН ЕГИПЕТ И АФРИКА » Религия и философия

Samuel A.B. Mercer - Horus: Royal God of Egypt
15.05.2022, 09:15

Още от зората на египетската държавност слънчевият бог-сокол Хор и свързаните с него митове са ключови за оформянето на културата и владетелската идеология на страната. От времето на I династия (XXXI в. пр. н.е.) той е родов тотем на царете на Нехен (Йераконполис), обединили под своята власт страната, създавайки първата в света национална държава. Историята за Хор като син на Озирис, който отмъщава за смъртта на баща си в борба с неговия убиец Сет е основополагащ за разбирането на представите на египтяните за легендарното начало на техните управляващи династии. Самите фараони се разглеждат като въплъщение на това слънчево божество. настоящата кратка монография е фокусирана върху представите за това божество и неговите роля и място в пантеона.
Любопитно най-вече от гледна точка на историята на египтологията морално остаряло изследване на иначе оставилия солидна следа англо-канадски учен Самюъл А.Б. Мърсър (1880-1969). Проучването е типично за времето и школата си аналитично преосмисляне на древноегипетската митология в духа на британската колониална идеологическа матрица. На мястото на приказките за древноегипетските богове-герои идват не по-малко митологичните (с или без археологическа обосновка) разкази за носещите цивилизация нашественици от чужбина, които създали египетската култура на основата на тази от Двуречието. Разбира се, в този контекст спецификите, отличаващи Египет от Месопотамия, като например обожествяването на владетеля, така нетипично и неприсъщо за мисленето на Двуречието се игнорират изцяло. Не по-малко недоумение буди изключително повръхностното, базиращо се на банална омонимия отъждествяване името на Хор с хуритите, обитаващи Мала Азия.
Като цяло, монографията се основава на опростенческо евгемеристично тълкуване, приемащо  Озирис и Хор за реални и по-късно обожествени исторически личности, лидери на кланове от нашественици, проникнали в Делтата за да покорят местните племена и да извършат хипотетично "първо  обединение на Египет". Въпреки недостатъците си, монографията би могла да представлява интерес от гледна точка проучване на развитието на египтологията под влиянието на расовите теории от края на XIX и първата половина на XX век.

Samuel A.B. Mercer - Horus: Royal God of Egypt, Grafton (MA), Society of Oriental Research, 1942

АЛТЕРНАТИВЕН ЛИНК / ALTERNATIVE LINK:

Samuel A.B. Mercer - Horus: Royal God of Egypt, Grafton (MA), Society of Oriental Research, 1942

АЛТЕРНАТИВЕН ЛИНК / ALTERNATIVE LINK:

Samuel A.B. Mercer - Horus: Royal God of Egypt, Grafton (MA), Society of Oriental Research, 1942

- на английски език, от Google Drive, формат PDF. Сваляне с ляв бутон (downloading by left button) от страницата на предоставящия сървър, после през бутона стрелка надолу/after by down arrow button.

 

Added by: Admin | | Tags: древноегипетска религия, древноегипетска митология, Озирис, фараони, сет, Древен Египет, хор
Views: 445 | Placed till: 15.06.2024 | Rating: 0.0/0
Total comments: 2
1 Admin  
0
Horus or Heru, Hor, Har in Ancient Egyptian, is one of the most significant ancient Egyptian deities who served many functions, most notably god of kingship and the sky. He was worshipped from at least the late prehistoric Egypt until the Ptolemaic Kingdom and Roman Egypt. Different forms of Horus are recorded in history, and these are treated as distinct gods by Egyptologists. These various forms may be different manifestations of the same multi-layered deity in which certain attributes or syncretic relationships are emphasized, not necessarily in opposition but complementary to one another, consistent with how the Ancient Egyptians viewed the multiple facets of reality. He was most often depicted as a falcon, most likely a lanner falcon or peregrine falcon, or as a man with a falcon head.
The earliest recorded form of Horus is the tutelary deity of Nekhen in Upper Egypt, who is the first known national god, specifically related to the ruling pharaoh who in time came to be regarded as a manifestation of Horus in life and Osiris in death. The most commonly encountered family relationship describes Horus as the son of Isis and Osiris, and he plays a key role in the Osiris myth as Osiris's heir and the rival to Set, the murderer and brother of Osiris. In another tradition Hathor is regarded as his mother and sometimes as his wife.

2 Admin  
0
An investigation outdated in senses both egyptological and historical, based on speculative teories about "dynastic race", but still interresting from a curiosity driven point of view. The controversial race theories from the end of XIX and the first half of XX centuries no doubt flawed the monograph, so despite this disadvantage, it is still useful - with corresponding avareness and caution, off course.
We have here specific commentary on early Egyptian history. The first three chapters deal at some length with the predynastic period in Egypt, and the author surveys a great deal of archacological information. The origin of the god Horus, he thinks, is to be found in the broken and tangled skeins of archaeological finds and elaborate hypothesis that form our body of knowledge for this carly period. Breasted reduced фе union of Egypt under Menes to thе rank of а “second union” and it has now been made bе “third.” Before this union, during Ше predynastic period, there were two carlier unions, the second of which gave bе to the prominent myth of Ше bloody encounter between Horus and Set. This struggle, Mercer thinks, represents а historic event. Before this time, during the period of the “second civilization,” Horus had come to Egypt, probably from Mesopotamia (or perhaps from the Hurrians to the north and west), and had settled in thе Egyptian Delta. Appropriating, or  mingling with, some earlier deity there, thе cult of this sky-god soon spread throughout the Delta and then over Egypt after his victory over Set, the deity of Ombos.
This is an interesting construction of early Egyptian history. Along with thе main theme, Mercer deals boldly with several other controversial problems. Не favors the view that the inauguration of the calendar was marked not by the Sothic cycle that began in 4241 but by Ше one which began in 2781, and that it was made at Memphis, not at Heliopolis. He contends (p. 59) that the god Osiris was a deified hero who had probably been leader of an invading tribe. He accepts and carriesfurther, belicve, а suggestion of Albright’s, when he suggests that thе rider-god Heron of Egypt, identified by Rostovtzeff and Kazarow with а Thracian rider, was probably an old deity of Syria, known in а Canaanite form and possibly, like Horus, connected with the Hurrians. All this is striking and ingenious interpretation, but, naturally, evidence lacking to make these suggestions more than hypothesis. There is little more that one can do with much of this material than to point out thе possible and probable lines of contact, transmission, and influence.
The material in the remaining chapters is largely factual, and it is a welcome collection of facts and data from many difficult sources. In these chapters material is collected on the name, family, titles, and symbols of Horus, Horus gods, gods identified and gods associated with Horus, thе еуе of Horus, places where Horus was worshiped, representations of Horus, and thе theology and worship of Horus. There is an appendix containing epithets of Horus, one of person names  in which the name of Horus appears, and а plate of hieroglyphics to serve chapters iv-vi. There is an adequate index too.

Only registered users can add comments.
[ Registration | Login ]